maning sambale claviota:
Hi,

I am intrigued by this situation as we plan to incrementally migrate
our basemaps  to a dbase.  Both geospatial dbase are supported in
QGIS.  We have initially tested both and it's running fine with qgis
1.5.  Although our test barely scratched the surface (just import,
display and a few edits).

Reading through regina's review [1]:
"spatial functionality and speed of MySQL significantly lags that of
SQL Server 2008 spatial and PostGIS"

I am curious about the statement, mysql is one of the most widely used
"open source" general purpose database but not very much used for
"geo".

Our plan is to use QGIS as the main data browser but there should be
some option to consume the data in ArcGis.  Any real world scenarios
comparing both database that can help us decide ultimately?
I had to take such a decision, about 3 years ago, for a large database holding drill holes data, in the mining industry. I did quite a few tests, and it quickly appeared that postgresql was WAY ahead of mysql, in terms of performance. To give you a rough idea, nested queries with 2 to 4 nests were about one thousand times quicker in postgresql.

The thing is, postgresql and mysql are not exactly on the same "market": mysql is usually preferred to work in the back of a website, with php. It proved to be extremely robust, but queries, in these cases, are usually quite simple, and data models are also pretty simple. Postgresql allows you to do way more complex and efficient things.


[1] 
http://www.bostongis.com/PrinterFriendly.aspx?content_name=sqlserver2008_postgis_mysql_compare
One little question (please forgive my English ignorance...): what does "gotchas" mean? (in: "SQL Server while its not free except for its express version, all its spatial is fully-supported in its express (so no major hidden gotchas), its pricing is...")


PS. I am fairly convinced with using PostGIS but other ideas are
welcome for us to have a more informed decision. :)
I use postgresql with postgis and I am about 100% satisfied, sometimes a bit more. My clients and colleagues sometimes do not like it that much, because of the lack of ready-to-run GUI for tables, forms, etc. In fact, they miss access, they were a bit "formatted" that way...

A+
Pierre

--
____________________________________________________________________________
Pierre Chevalier Géologue EI
   Mesté Duran
   32100 Condom
 Tél+fax  :    09 75 27 45 62
               05 62 28 06 83
                06 37 80 33 64
 Émail  :   pierrechevaliergeolCHEZfree.fr
 icq#   :   10432285
 skype  :   pierre.chevalier1967
 http://pierremariechevalier.free.fr/pierre_chevalier_geologue
____________________________________________________________________________



_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to