Yes I meant Warp. Enjoy, Alex
On 07/29/2011 11:22 AM, Magnus Ekhall wrote: > I'm using 1.7 with the "on the fly" box ticked. > > I did not know of the GDALTools plugin. > > Did you mean the Warp tool? (I can't find any transformation...) > > Regards, > Magnus > > On 29 July 2011 19:53, Alex Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Oh and you have to check the Project on the Fly box (1.7+) in addition >> to selecting the projection. >> >> Enjoy, >> Alex >> >> On 07/29/2011 10:45 AM, Alex Mandel wrote: >>> That depends, if you're using 1.7 that should work anything older and it >>> won't. But I actually meant you should use the GDALTools plugin to >>> reproject the file (Transformation). >>> >>> Enjoy, >>> Alex >>> >>> On 07/29/2011 10:32 AM, Magnus Ekhall wrote: >>>> I've tried that by going to Settings -> Project Settings and switching >>>> to SWEREF99 there (immediate coordinate transformation box is ticked). >>>> >>>> But nothing happens at all which is surprising. >>>> >>>> When I look at the paper map I can see that indeed the SWEREF99 >>>> coordinates are square, but the WGS84 are stretched vertically. >>>> >>>> Am I doing something wrong with the reprojection? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Magnus >>>> >>>> On 29 July 2011 19:27, Alex Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 07/29/2011 09:49 AM, Magnus Ekhall wrote: >>>>>> I'm a beginner with qgis and need some help. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've scanned a map and georeferenced it using the plugin. >>>>>> >>>>>> When it appears in qgis it looks stretched: about double as wide as on >>>>>> paper. >>>>>> However, the coordinates are correct. I can load a gpx-file into a >>>>>> vector layer, and it gets overlaid on the correct parts of the raster >>>>>> map. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a way to change horizontal and/or vertical scale on the screen? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the reason might be (please correct me if I'm wrong) that the >>>>>> paper map is originally in SWEREF99, but I georeferenced in using >>>>>> points of WGS84... >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried to georeference it in SWEREF99 directly, but then the gpx >>>>>> tracks would load to completely different areas. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Magnus >>>>> >>>>> Try reprojecting it to the SWEREF99 and it will likely look more like >>>>> the paper map. >>>>> >>>>> Enjoy, >>>>> Alex >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Qgis-user mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qgis-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >> > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
