Oh sorry, that was Polynomial 1, using only four GCPs. I'd have used Polynomial 2 but it was hard to find matching points.
On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Zirneklitis wrote: > It depends on transformation type. > > T. Gray Shaw wrote: >> .. I do not understand why >> the GCPs did not maintain their position on the raster layer. >> .. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user T. Gray Shaw ISA Certified Arborist # WE-1037 Redway and Berkeley, CA 510 418-3420 Skype: tgrayshaw
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
