It's ok as far as people are told about it. A better structure is always welcome, but note that putting too many of the tools currently organized as menu bars within 1 single vertical menu will also become uncomfortable. By now it's fine, as there are relatively few main subsections within the Sextante Toolbox.
Agus 2012/5/7 Victor Olaya <[email protected]>: > They are just alternative versions, as you said. We are trying to > incorporate all tools into SEXTANTE, consuming algorithms from > external apps, but these might contain algorithms already included in > other apps also linked from SEXTANTE (there are, for instance, many > common elements between GRASS and SAGA) > > I hope this does not confuse the user, but all opinions are welcome > > Regards > > victor > > 2012/5/7 Agustin Lobo <[email protected]>: >> Hi! >> >> What's the purpose of having some of the tools provided by mmqgis and >> fTools within >> the SAGA Toolbox? Are those alternative, faster implementations or >> just another way of >> structuring the menu? >> >> Thanks >> >> Agus >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
