Thanks for the hint, Zirneklitis !
"You can't use REAL field type for ID as it a bit approximately, e.g., number '1234567890123456789' will memorised as '1,23456789012347E+018'. The INTEGER should be used instead. ... " Wasn't our/my idea to do so. The file was created by authorities and we had to process it. Seems, that this works with the given definition in ArcGIS - however ESRI is achieving that. Regards, Christine -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/shapefile-dbf-number-limitation-tp4891669p4980251.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
