On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Michael Werner Maur <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > we provide many WMS. These WMS are supported by UMN Mapserver. In some of the > concerning MAP-Files the Header-Marker 'EXTENT' has an smaller expansion than > the 'EXTENT' of an individual layer of that WMS. > > The result is, that the given picture in QGis is cut to the size of the > Header's extent. > > Is this really the correct interpretation of the WMS standard ? There are > other GIS systems, that do not interpretate the standard in that way !
The standard says nothing (AFAICT) about a situation when the extent reported in GetCapabilities is wrong (differ from layer extent). It is simply server side problem IMO. Definitely we are not going to support such a case because that would mean to always request full current extent even if we are outside (according to GetCapabilities) the layer extent. Radim > Here the URL of the WMS to test it : > > http://www.geoportal.rlp.de/mapbender/php/mod_showMetadata.php/../wms.php?layer_id=36465&PHPSESSID=847f2d5bfce485e9a7dcd93c74ce55b1&REQUEST=GetCapabilities&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS > > > with best regards > -- > Michael Maur > > LANDESAMT FÜR VERMESSUNG UND GEOBASISINFORMATION RHEINLAND-PFALZ > > Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße 15 > 56073 Koblenz > Telefon 0261 492-152 > Telefax 0261 492-492 > [email protected] > www.lvermgeo.rlp.de > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
