here is the list of my favourite logos .. in order from top to bottom http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/7 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/64 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/198 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/213 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/216 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/226 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/179 http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/153
regards Werner On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Stephane Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the options that try to mix a compass with a Q. > It would be nice if it were something derived from de OSGeo logo. > > The concept is in some of the logos, but they're still not quite there in > terms of design: > > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/231 > > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/198 > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/48 > http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/7 > > I also agree that using the POI common symbol is not a good option. > > Readability is fundamental, +1 for > > ----- Original Message ----- > I really don't understand the love for #50. It either reads as > GIS-uantum, or QGIS-uantum or on third inspection QGIS-Quantum. Its > impossible to read it as "Quantum GIS". > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
