Thanks Andreas, I haven't tried QGIS server from master yet. Nice to know it.
giovanni 2013/6/21 Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> > Hi Giovanni, > > It is important that you test QGIS master not QGIS 1.8. QGIS 1.8 was > definitely slower than UMN, but in master there are performance > improvements in the server part. Marco knows the details. > > Andreas > > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:09:18 +0200, G. Allegri wrote: > >> Hi, >> I was reading the graphs (I do not understand german, sorry) of the >> slides from Sourcepole about their banchmarks [1]. >> I was surprised to see how QGIS Server outperforms UMN Mapserver, >> because my experience was different. I haven't done comparisons in the >> last months. In the past performances didn't appear better then >> Mapserver. >> >> Marco (and the ohters from Sourcepole), could you share the >> configurations adopted for the benchmark? Hardware, http server >> configuration, caching, tiling, etc.? Something is written inside the >> PDF, but Google Translator isn't doing a great work :( >> >> Thanks a lot, >> Giovanni >> >> >> [1] http://sourcepole.ch/**assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_** >> performanceoptimierte_wms_**dienste.pdf<http://sourcepole.ch/assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_performanceoptimierte_wms_dienste.pdf> >> [1] >> > > -- > -- > Andreas Neumann > Böschacherstrasse 10A > 8624 Grüt (Gossau ZH) > Switzerland > ______________________________**_________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-user<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user> > -- Giovanni Allegri http://about.me/giovanniallegri blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
