Hi guys, I've never understood why we had a concern about licensing on the Intergraph side in the first place. But has anyone recorded the logic around how this doesn't violate *the GPL*? Wouldn't QGIS need a license exception to allow this? If not, it would be nice to put this interpretation of the GPL on the record...
Regards, Alister On 21/08/2013, at 7:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Send Qgis-user mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Qgis-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Large raster datasets in 2.0 (Giovanni Manghi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:06:45 +0100 > From: Giovanni Manghi <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Large raster datasets in 2.0 > Message-ID: > <CACfnYnTjyJSQhc7va=_tpL9pTi7=9e9esgvwnecrrjdbu_g...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >> This has all been >> cleared with the ECW product manager from Intergraph. > > after the post has been written :) > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > > End of Qgis-user Digest, Vol 90, Issue 51 > ***************************************** _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
