I think QGIS is innocent in this - if a band is set as an alpha channel then it should be handled as such by default in a viewer (so mark down Arc for not using the alpha information!).

GDAL is the culprit as it is adding the alpha interpretation without being prompted. I have just replicated this with some RGBI imagery myself: prior to passing through GDAL's hands the IR band is present, but isn't interpreted as an alpha channel. I can't get the -setci switch to do anything though :(

Cheers,

Andy

On 02/12/2013 16:00, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi Andy,
Yep, that was it. I didn't know QGIS could do that; another good example of software trying to be "smart" and confusing the poor user. :-)

====

I didn't know gdalwarp could do mosaicing too. I'll have to test it. I'll ask on the gdal list if I want to try the -setci parameter.

Many thanks!
Jonathan


On 2 December 2013 15:48, Andrew Harfoot <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    PS. gdalwarp offers more flexibility when mosaicing rasters, and
    is better at memory management. I have just noticed that in GDAL
    1.10 and above there is an gdalwarp option -setci that 'Sets the
    color interpretation of the bands of the target dataset from the
    source dataset'. This could be used to remove the assignment of
    the alpha channel to the IR band on merging. Sadly there isn't an
    example of its usage!


    Cheers,

    Andy

    On 02/12/2013 11:53, Jonathan Moules wrote:
    Hi List,
    I've got a 4 band raster aerial photography (RGBI) that comprises
    lots of tiles. I've merged some of the tiles together with:

        gdal_merge -o 1.tif -of GTiff -co TILED=YES -co BIGTIFF=YES
        -co COMPRESS=JPEG -co JPEG_QUALITY=50 -co BLOCKXSIZE=512 -co
        BLOCKYSIZE=512 --optfile tiff_list.txt


    But the resultant file looks funny in QGIS.
    This is what the source file looks like (correct):
    Inline images 1

    This is what the merged file looks like (wrong):
    Inline images 2

    All the shadows are a whitey colour. This doesn't happen with
    3-band (RGB) images.
    I've tried comparing individual bands; they all look different in
    the 4-band.

    However, if I open the four-band in ArcGIS, it looks fine (both
    source and original).

    Anyone know what's going on? Is it a QGIS bug or is it doing
    something "smart"; I can't see anything odd going on with symbology.

    Thanks,
    Jonathan

    This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and
    may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to
    RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the
    named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee)
    you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you
    have received this transmission in error please notify the sender
    immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including
    without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording
    and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.


    _______________________________________________
    Qgis-user mailing list
    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


-- Andy Harfoot

    GeoData Institute
    University of Southampton
    Southampton
    SO17 1BJ

    Tel:+44 (0)23 8059 2719  <tel:%2B44%20%280%2923%208059%202719>
    Fax:+44 (0)23 8059 2849  <tel:%2B44%20%280%2923%208059%202849>

    www.geodata.soton.ac.uk  <http://www.geodata.soton.ac.uk>


    _______________________________________________
    Qgis-user mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.


--
Andy Harfoot

GeoData Institute
University of Southampton
Southampton
SO17 1BJ

Tel:  +44 (0)23 8059 2719
Fax:  +44 (0)23 8059 2849

www.geodata.soton.ac.uk

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to