If I could chip in - one of my clients is a large industrial client. They have two sides of their "mapping" group - Autocad and ESRI. Then I show up : ).

They use the DWG format - in fact most of my clients that have autocad capability will send me DWG and when I go "hey could you convert that to dxf" there is a general groan. So - I pop open arcgis and convert. Now that I think about it I've never tried converting data from dwg to shape or back to dwg with gdal. I don't know if that is even possible (I need to look). TN's department of Transportation runs a healthy mix of ESRI/AutoCAD/Microstation (I think) but as far as a know no open source anything. I get the question of "What about DWG?" more than I care to mention.

Having DWG capabilites would be a huge gain for QGIS (I think).

Anyway - my unsolicited .02 cents worth.

Randy

On 06/15/2015 03:28 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi Micha,

That is interesting - we invested a lot in the DXF export capabilities of QGIS. Once this is finished I am pretty sure we will also look to improve the situation regarding the import.

Do you think import of DXF is enough or do we also need DWG support? If so, the best bet would probably be the Teigha library from the Open Design Alliance (https://www.opendesign.com/the_oda_platform/Teigha), which isn't available for free - but it is the library most other GIS (eg. ESRI, Intergraph) and CAD (eg. Bentley, Bricscad, etc.) are using. We would have to pay a membership fee, but it allows us to redistribute the library with the software. Membership in the consortium is affordable in my opinion.

What are your thoughts on this? Would you also be available to help with a crowd-funding effort? Do you see options besides Teigha?

Andreas

On 15.06.2015 08:57, Micha Silver wrote:


On 06/15/2015 09:23 AM, Bernhard Ströbl wrote:
Hi Joseph,

could you elaborate why "it would be unrealistic to say we
could ever be a 100% QGIS"? I am curious because I lost contact with ESRI products a couple years ago.


From our point of view, we need support for dwg. That side of vendor lock-in is, unfortunately, even stronger that the ties to ESRI. So we stay with Arc* not because of the GIS capabilites, but more or less only because of the ability to read Autocad plans and surveys.




_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

--
-----------------
Randal Hale
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 [email protected]
twitter:rjhale     http://about.me/rjhale
http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis
Southeast OSGEO: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Southeast_US

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to