This might be a question for the Developer list. I think you'll need to
dig into the code that does the proj reading/matching to figure out how
it translates the wkt to prj strings/db parameters to match.

Thanks,
Alex

On 11/15/2015 02:43 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Alex,
> You got me thinking that I have the wrong projection. epsg.io lead me to
> 2926 and 2927.
> 
> However, both of those are in the QGIS. Assuming that QGIS uses the .prj
> file for the reference, what fields does it match?
> 
> QGIS does operate correctly using the custom projection. However, for
> someone new, like me, it helps knowing the projections.
> 
> Thanks,
> Clifford
> 
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Clifford Snow <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Alex Mandel <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> http://epsg.io/102348
>>
>>
>> I didn't catch the HARN. And the 10348 and 10349 are both in meters. I'm
>> getting NAD83_HARN in feet which doesn't match the definition of 10349. And
>> 10749 is in feet but not with HARN. So maybe it isn't in the table.
>>
>>
>> --
>> @osm_seattle
>> osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
>> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> 

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to