Il 11/28/2015 09:34 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde scrisse:
2 options:
- xml guru confirms that it is not ok to write a uri in a xmlns attribute
No xml guru around here? :-)
- if you are able to compile yourself, you could try to change #53 to
change to 'wfs' instead of the uri, and check if all requests are still
valid...
Compiling is not feasible for me.
Is there a way to intercept the request using a plugin?
Ok perhaps it is easier to compile but what I'dlike to know is who is
the "culprit", qgis or geoserver?
I posted months ago my problems using qgis and geoserver prior to 2.7.1.
I made many tests adding and updating features and everything worked
fine. I'd like to know if something changed in qgis and the way the
request is created.
Thank you
maxx
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
