On 01/20/2016 11:14 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, 20. Jan 2016 at 09:04:52 +0100, Neumann, Andreas wrote: >> I also remember that Marco Hugentobler (Sourcepole) was contracted to >> fix these Shapefile issues for the province of Vorarlberg - though I may >> be wrong. So there is already someone investing to fix this bug. Marco - >> correct me if I am wrong. > Yes, please. I thought this was a fact - and didn't look at all into > the problem. > > Not sure if QGIS always does a REPACK (it used to after each delete - but that > changes feature ids and interferes with internal stuff). I'm also not sure > that GDAL 2 fixes the problem - the comments to the ticket are not conclusive > in that regard (GRASS is probably not a good test as it also uses GDAL and > hence also should follow it's interpretation of what's deleted; see also > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2016-January/043483.html).
This behavior is restored since 2.10 (internally there's a `dataChanged()` signal sent around to notify interested parties that all feature id caches need to be cleared). GDAL 2.0 should fix an issue with repack and changed geometries IIRC. Matthias > > > Jürgen > > > PS: @Saber may your GDAL 2.0.0dev come from experiments with this? OSGeo4W > has > 1.11.3 (or 2.0.0 as experimental - which QGIS doesn't use - but no *dev). > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user -- Matthias Kuhn OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source
_______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
