Hi Nyall,

Thanks for your work on this issue(s) and esp. the unit tests.

I did a swift test with a 100km vector grid using master version 5d989ab (which 
probably does not contain all your changes?).

Area measurements are consistent across field calculator and identify tool. 
However, the field calculator (using an 8 digits numeric field) shows some 
minor and probably neglectable imprecisions (e.g. compared to GRASS). GRASS 
reports exacly 10000000000.00000000 m2, while the field calculator gives 
something like 10000000000 +/- 0.0005 (OTF off).

With OTF on measurements differ significantly compared to GRASS and OTF off, 
due to ellipsoidal metric used with OTF on I guess. Personally, I find this 
difference confusing, but I trust the difference in behavior btw. OTF on and 
off is a deliberate choice of the more accurate area measure?!

Choosing no measurement ellipsoid in the project settings gives the same 
behavior as OTF off.

Kind regards,
Stefan





-----Original Message-----
From: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Nyall 
Dawson
Sent: 15. februar 2016 21:49
To: qgis-developer <qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org>; qgis-user 
<qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [Qgis-user] Please test length/area measurement in master

Hi all,

Just putting out a call for extensive testing of length and area measurements 
in the current master version. Over the past week I've done a bunch of work 
trying to simplify the situation regarding length/area calculation and unit 
handling, with the intention of closing http://hub.qgis.org/issues/13209 and 
the other outstanding area calculation issues (plus locking all this down with 
unit tests!).

I'd really appreciate thorough testing being done by users to ensure that this 
bug is now indeed fixed prior to the 2.14 release.

Things to check:

- measured length/area is consistent across the identify tool results, field 
calculator, and measure tool. (note that there's still an open bug regarding 
virtual fields - there's a PR open to fix this but it's not merged yet). 
Testing with different combinations of geographic/non geographic CRS, OTF 
projection on/off and various ellipsoid/planimetric calculations would be 
perfect.
- test the new project properties settings for project distance/area units and 
coordinate formats
- test the reworked options for QGIS angle units and measurement of angles 
using the measure tool

Thanks in advance!

Nyall
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to