Hi,
So it seems like there isn't anything substantial missing from the 64bit
version and your diff shows that the 64bit version has the newer package
versions. So it should be the recommended version on Windows, in my opinion.
Andreas
On 20.06.2016 12:17, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 20/06/2016 13:12, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, 20. Jun 2016 at 12:48:07 +0300, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
AFAIK there are still packages missing form the 64bit version:
http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/versions_diff-x86-x86_64.html
It would be great to align the two, so we could recommend the 64 in most
cases.
We don't? I do. What's missing? The list doesn't make a difference
between stuff not there and stuff missing (ie. cruft isn't missing).
OTB used to be my main missing feature, but if I interpret correctly now
it's also on 64, so OK.
Are the python libs useful for external plugins also fully aligned?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
