On 22 November 2016 at 08:49, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 November 2016 at 07:36, Erik Heinz <eh0907-q...@42net.de> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am having problems with some rule bases style definitions thad used to >> work up to 2.16 but do not work in 2.18 any more. The elements in question >> are simply not drawn. I could not figure out any logic in what does work >> and what does not. >> >> Are there any changes in rule syntax? Or removal of undocumented features? >> I could not find any in the Changelog. Or should I suspect and report a bug? >> >> I am back to 2.16.2 for the moment. > > Can you share your rule definitions?
Erik, I've had a look and found the issue. One of your rules uses the expression: boundary='administrative' In 2.18 a new boundary(...) function was introduced, so this expression is now flagged as an error (since it's trying to call a function without passing any arguments). Changing the filter to: "boundary"='administrative' Makes it work again. Wrapping boundary in " " tells QGIS that you're referring to a field name here, not the function of the same name. In general it's good practice to always wrap field names in " "s to avoid this situation. Cheers, Nyall > > Nyall > >> >> >> Best regards, >> Erik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-user mailing list >> Qgisfirstname.lastname@example.org >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgisemail@example.com List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user