We have tried to build everything on experimental ppa before we move the
packages to unstable ppa (and when we move packages to unstable we send
an e-mail to the QGIS packagers to rebuild their repo). Unfortunately
not all UbuntuGIS packagers wait until they publish on unstable, so
things like that might happen.
Best,
Angelos
On 09/28/2017 12:16 AM, Patrick Dunford wrote:
Isn't there possibly an option not to release packages for xenial and
older until it's tested that ubuntugis works. As it only affects these
older versions.
I can sympathise with OPs as I have been caught many times forgetting
to comment out the repos in sources.list and unexpectedly being
updated to a later qgis version that breaks something :)
On 28/09/17 06:08, Andre Joost wrote:
Am 27.09.2017 um 18:57 schrieb Alex M:
My recommendation is that you do not upgrade QGIS as soon as the update
shows up but wait a day or two. Make sure the corresponding GRASS
update
is available.
In this case, QGIS 2.18.13 worked for just one day, then GRASS got
updated and broke the qgis plugin. If you'd refused the GRASS update,
it would still work. There is nothing that the ubuntugis maintainers
could do for it now.
So lets hope that QGIS 2.18.14 may live longer.
Greetings,
André Joost
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
