Someone else has suggested an updated source here: : https://github.com/BiologicalRecordsCentre/vice-counties Am currently checking those polygons and so far they seem ok, they note there was an issue with the earlier version that I had been using, so the issue may now be solved.
Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Moules <[email protected]> Sent: 27 January 2020 15:54 To: Michael.Dodd <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Anyone use UK Watsonian vice counties? CAUTION: This mail comes from outside the University. Please consider this before opening attachments, clicking links, or acting on the content. We're possibly talking at cross purposes. I didn't follow the NBN link on that page, but instead used the the WFS URL ( http://geo.vliz.be:80/geoserver/wfs ) it provides which I connected to with QGIS and then added the Watsonian layer. I suggested it because it may work for your purposes where your current dataset does not. On 2020-01-27 15:47, Michael.Dodd wrote: > Unfortunately that link goes back to NBN and a page that no longer exists so > presumably it is the same dataset. > Qgis gives various errors depending on the analysis but always with those 8 > VC's, when trying 'check validity' it says there is a problem with self > intersection. Not sure how to fix this as it is not obvious when you zoom in > on the polygons. > > From: Jonathan Moules <[email protected]> > Sent: 27 January 2020 15:41 > To: Michael.Dodd <[email protected]>; > '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Anyone use UK Watsonian vice counties? > > > CAUTION: This mail comes from outside the University. Please consider this > before opening attachments, clicking links, or acting on the content. > > Hi Michael, > > There is a WFS with them in that works in QGIS: > > https://www.geoseer.net/rl.php?ql=f64d2064355b5bdb&p=1&q=watsonian > > Not tried them for analysis or exporting them, but may be worth a try. > > Cheers, > > Jonathan > > > On 2020-01-27 15:12, Michael.Dodd wrote: > > I have downloaded the set of polygons that was digitised by NBN. Then > converted to wgs84 but when I try to use the polygons, 8 of them: West > Norfolk, Herefordshire, Montgomeryshire, Shropshire, West Ross & Cromarty, > Orkney, Outer Hebrides, and Zetland do not work in analysis. Qgis says there > is a problem with those ones but says the rest are ok. > > > > Anyone else had similar issues and/or found ways to fix these? > > -- The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an > exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC > 038302). The Open University is authorised and regulated by the Financial > Conduct Authority in relation to its secondary activity of credit broking. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Qgis-user mailing list > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
