Hi John,
A very common error when printing PDF maps (regardless of the software
that generated the PDF), is that the print shop scales it down to fit
the "printable" area. Then you end up at somewhere around 95% (plus /
minus) a bit
The PDF viewers (at least the Acrobat one) has a setting to print at
100% (but this is not the default) - it has to be done consciously.
However, this normally scales uniformly, not separately for width and
height.
On the topic of "base maps":
Can you explain what source/mechanism for "base maps" you used? Are you
refering to "tiled" maps, perhaps consumed through the OpenLayers
plugin? This plugin is a known to be a source of error for misalignments
and the plugin should be avoided. Even if you didn't use this plugin, I
have to say that tiled base maps (e.g. consumed by the quick map
services plugin or otherwise) are usually not suited for printing as
their resolution is optimized for screen viewing. Printing these tiles
would result in disappointing quality.
Greetings,
Andreas
On 2021-05-27 07:15, John Antkowiak wrote:
Hi. This plan was too simple to fail - but it failed. The charity whose
project this is needed a large (that is... massive) paper wall map on
which to plot and rethink its delivery driver assignments. Both drivers
and delivery addresses are subject to change from week to week but it's
not a pizza delivery; this is a regular run to supply people in a bad
way. So the plan was to print the base map (roads and road names and
county boundaries only) and then print 8.5 x 11 address maps with
parcel data and orthos. That way, the base maps don't change but the
physical parcel layer is flexible. (On top of that is a third paper
layer indicating which drivers go where so someone can stand back and
take in the whole picture graphically. Not a cutting-edge state of the
digital art solution, but not everyone is cut out for that. It is what
it is.) In order for this to work, the parcel maps have to be the same
scale as the base map. Which they were... in QGIS.
We have to convert all the maps to PDF to print them, and we had to
send the base map PDFs to FedEx/Kinkos to print the 9 map grid panels
at 42" by 62" each.
When we got the big base maps up on the wall, we discovered the scale
did not match the 8.5" x 11" parcel maps output to PDF and printed from
home. It's not off by a lot, but it's enough to be painfully obvious
from a single standard size sheet of paper. I don't know how to reverse
engineer the big map scale precisely enough to enter a new scale number
in the QGIS Print Layout. I didn't foresee it because this never
would've been a conceivable scenario at the engineering firm where I
picked up my meager GIS skills. (ArcMap sent a map directly to the
plotter without interim steps.) There was no scale bar on the map. It
shouldn't have been needed for this.
Did something happen to the map scale when QGIS output the map to PDF?
Could the size of the image on the pdf page have been adjusted manually
or otherwise when being sent to a plotter with 42" paper? Could the
image have been distorted horizontally differently from vertically? For
the life of me, I cannot trial-and-error guess at a scale to enter.
I've gone through dozens of new 8.5" x 11" test maps trying to guess
the correct scale.
Any ideas?
Thank you all -
John A.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
