in QGIS 3.20.1 the behaviour is still the same.

Didn't found anything on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ABug+label%3A%22Print+Layouts%22+scalebar

so the best is to make a new issue on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues

Am 03.08.2021 um 01:56 schrieb Jeff Sonnentag:

I don’t know what a person would search for in the “issues” or “commits” to see if this is already known or fixed, but it is an annoyance (nothing particularly critical).

Anyway, in a Layout once you have Units set and Segments set to 4 (or anything other than 2) and then you change the Units to something else the number of Segments still says 4 in that option but the displayed Scalebar only shows 2 Segments.  To get things right you just have to increment up or down and then back to what you want for number of segments and the displayed Scalebar switches to what is actually in the Segments option.

Does anybody know if it is already taken care of in something newer (using 3.16.9 here) or if it is already known/reported?


_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Giese
Projektleiter/Consultant
************************************************************
Aufbau von Geodateninfrastrukturen mit Open-Source-Software
FOSS Academy 5 Tage-Kompaktkurs „Sommerschule 2021“
Jetzt anmelden: https://foss-academy.com/kompaktkurse/
*************************************************************
WhereGroup GmbH
Schwimmbadstr. 2
79100 Freiburg
Germany

Fon: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 61
Fax: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 11

[email protected]
www.wheregroup.com
Geschäftsführer:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885

_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to