> In case that RFC > is changed based on the discussions, the voting should get another > five days. > > Also what about the cases when later the dev finds out that he needs > to do things differently? Change the RFC and start voting again? Or > create a new RFC ...?
Good point. Maybe it should be possible to update an RFC and start voting again (also with five days voting period). To not loose discussion history, it should be done in a new document titled e.g. as update of RFC #15 cheers, Marco -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Institute of Cartography ETH Zurich Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
