On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > just wanted to add another vote for @This :) > > Having slept on the issue I have decided that this is my favourite as > well. Short and to the point and with inherited semantics from Java that > makes sense. > > If there are no strong factually based objections I will go ahead and > make this change next week.
I am Ok with that. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
