On Monday 14 April 2008 00:48, Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > So, till now I added "matches" to api and RDF implementations. The > other ones I left them out as can be expressed using the current api.
Ok. > Still, not decided about the ManyAssociation api: > * the isEmpty and isNotEmpty I can support them via isNull/isNotNull Perhaps change all to isAssigned, which is more descriptive than isNull, which IMHO is a Java implementation detail. > if I will allow also ManyAssociation (right now only > Properties/Associations are supported), but the isEmpty/isNotEmpty > looks to me like they express better the intent. Agree. > * shall we implement "contains"? I think it would be useful for ManyAssociations, but the previous String case can be scrapped IMHO, at least for now. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
