Niclas Hedhman wrote: > IMHO, it looks like neither the SideEffect, nor the MixinType will be fully > aware of the entire context, hence building in assembly concerns into the > domain models.
To some extent, yeah, that is true. > I think it will also make usage of asynch SideEffects much harder, and if > this > is the way we go, then I will strongly suggest we drop Async notion all > together for now. I think that the example you tried to show, can be done > without any new features in Core, and perhaps that is what you are trying to > say. The example I outlined was done without any changes to core, yeah. Just a base class side-effect that instantiates and delegates to an asynch mechanism. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
