Gang,
As I am so much into it, I am looking at BeanShell support as well.
Now, BeanShell can basically offer two different formats of doing this.
1) Strict Java. Define a class implementation, implementing the MixinType,
which we instantiate and executes the actual method being invoked.
Ex;
public class AbcMixin
implements Abc
{
public String doSomething()
{
return "Abc";
}
}
2) "Closure"-style. More like JavaScript, where a named closure is defined
which I suggest we call straight up.
Ex;
doSomething()
{
return "Abc";
}
Should we support both of these? If not, which one?
And shall the first case have a different extension, so that we can map such
extension against the IDE's Java language support? Does it have to be .java
in any IDE?
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
