Tobias Ivarsson wrote: > I was wondering about the ordering of the invocations of > Activatable#passivate() for services that depend on other services. > > If service A depends on service B, are there any guarantees that service > B is still active when passivate() is invoked on service A?
Hm, excellent question. No, right now the passivate happens in the order that the services were defined. But, if A uses B, but A is registered before B (so it should faily if it uses B in activate()) I think B will actually be activated when A tries to use it. There should probably be some reordering done based on injection dependencies between the services, so that this is not a problem. I need to look into that. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
