> There is a third way to define the structure (single assembler as one, > the one you mention being the other), and it works similar to what you > ask, see http://www.qi4j.org/70.html in the Explicit Assembly section > for a full example.
I was thinking of having something that is half way between passing an Assembler[][][] and doing it fully by hand as shown in the Explicit Assembly section. But yeah, I can understand the difficulty in having a more fluent API for that. Cheers, Sonny _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
