On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Will it be generic?? I am a bit tired now, but the SCM would implement > > Configuration, no?? > > Correct. It's a bit tricky for the mixin to figure out what the T > generic type is, but I made a quick spike and it seems doable, with the > only problem being that it requires use of SPI interfaces
Ooooookk. Not sure what in SPI you are referring to. I am not too sure when you can and when you can not reach the generic types, but GutFeeling is that this is a member field and therefor it is possible.... Anyway, if it can be done in the SPI, we could also replicate the code, since the cyclic dep is not possible. Well, we could introduce a new interface for it, but that would then be exposed in API... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
