On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to get this going as easily and flexibly as possible I > therefore added the following method to UnitOfWork: > void registerUnitOfWorkSynchronization(UnitOfWorkSynchronization > synchronization); I think that either; a) Don't require the registration, and instead let UoW explicitly know of a MixinType that signals the callback. or b) Allow anyone to register synch callbacks, in which case the Entity instance must also be passed in the sync calls. IMHO, I think that a) is the better choice for validation and that we introduce the "Specification" or "Contract" separately for cross-Entity checks and other rules not possible in a "per Entity" point of view. Also, UnitOfWorkSynchronization? Is that descriptive? I can't come up with a better name, but asking the many lurkers to chip in. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
