Well, much of this refers to many people creating their own branches. If we do it like now, there will not be as many branches so much of the merging will not benecessary or at least similar to what we do with a "svn up" right now.
We probably would need a server area to host the different repos at, though, so people can access them without being forced to work P2P with everyone. /peter On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Now, what I am more concerned over is the sheer number of commands >> that is listed as "the Daily routine"... > > > Here is the link I am referring to; > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/everyday.html > > > Cheers > Niclas > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > -- GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer ICQ 18762544 GTalk neubauer.peter Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
