Mmh, if we use @Ignore for tests that need fixing, how will we track them? Is there anything alerting the developer that this needs fixing? IMHO a failing test is just that - a reminder that things need to be fixed.
/peter On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alin Dreghiciu wrote: > > I guess that original idea was that parts of the tests like > > performance tests and maybe this ones too, to be run only on demand > > and not all the time. This can be achieved via a Maven profile. I will > > look into it. > > But wouldn't it be better to always run them after they have been fixed? > I kind of liked the suggestion to mark as @Ignore in Subversion, and the > one that fixes it removes the @Ignore. > > /Rickard > > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > > -- GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer ICQ 18762544 GTalk neubauer.peter Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer http://www.neo4j.org - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database. http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
