+1 :)

Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> On Wednesday 28 May 2008 20:15, Rickard Öberg wrote:
>>     
>>> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Wednesday 28 May 2008 17:17, Rickard Öberg wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Alright, I just managed to make the first instantiation and invocation
>>>>> of a Composite with the new refactoring and all I can say is: OMG OMG
>>>>> OMG OMG!!!
>>>>>           
>>>> Anxiously awaiting some commits....
>>>>         
>>> How do we want to do this, btw? Should I commit what I have now to head
>>> (which will break just about everything), or what? If I am to wait until
>>> all is working again it's gonna take a while.
>>>       
>> I think we should tag/release the existing stuff as 0.2.0, and make this a 
>> 0.3
>> effort.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>>
>> I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
>> I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
>> I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> qi4j-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-- 
-Wicket for love

Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684


_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to