On Thursday 29 May 2008 11:43, Raoul Duke wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't trying to comment on how qi4j should be written! I was > just chiming in about reality elsewhere ;-)
Well, that I know of. But even in "other people's mess", I wouldn't go in and blindly do a change like that. Purpose is limited, and even if you find re-assignments that way, it is often not obvious if it is intentional and what to do about it later. Meaning, I rather do non-functional refactorings to make the code more readable and better communicating intent than start messing with "final". Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
