I did not had a deep look into it but is definitively much more
cleaner and understandable. Does it actually work? :) On long run this
will pay off as it become maintainable.
I wanted do do some changes but I guess that that will interfere with
your work and merging will be hard. Or not? Shall I do it or wait for
you to have a stable version? Well, as stable as we get used to be :)

Alin

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just committed the new code. What you want to look at is
> org.qi4j.runtime.composite.qi and org.qi4j.runtime.structure.qi
> packages, which is where all the new code is.
>
> Everything has been condensed down into *Model classes. This includes
> model building, resolution, binding and instantiation. In other words,
> those Model classes has quite a lot of stuff in them. However, since
> they are more than before as all collections are now explicitly modelled
> I don't think they will become too large or messy (I hope).
>
> There is one test class right now, CompositeCompositeTest. It
> instantiates and builds up the application model, binds it, and then
> instantiates and invokes a Composite.
>
> I'm a bit worried still about whether all of this will work out in the
> end, but there's no way to find out other than try I think. So far it
> looks good.
>
> I'm going to continue to implement the various dependency injection
> providers now, and also add concerns and side-effects.
>
> /Rickard
>
> _______________________________________________
> qi4j-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
>



-- 
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places

_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to