It is exactly the bootstrap before Assembly I am thinking about. -- Niclas On 5/30/08, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> On Friday 30 May 2008 18:18, Rickard Öberg wrote: >>> As it is now the Energy4Java runtime class has no value as a holder of >>> builders/factories, and it will probably be demoted to just be the >>> API/SPI/runtime bridge (e.g. exposing runtime information in the API >>> where necessary). >> >> I will try to put forward a upgraded bootstrap mechanism in the weekend. > > Don't, I already got it covered. It seems reasonably easy to adapt the > only Assembly code to the new model. The main addition will be to try > and fix so that client code only needs to import API+bootstrap to get > going, i.e. bootstrap will not expose runtime thingies unless you > absolutely want to. > > /Rickard > > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev >
-- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
