Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I don't get what it is you are trying to do... > > You are right, I was braindead somewhere... Although your statement > made me a bit concerned; "Private Mixin is making the Composite...". > > Can you formulate what "Private Mixin" really means in terms of > CompositeType, MixinType, Mixins, Mixin implementation?
When a @This injection refers to a Mixin Type which is not extended by the Composite type that becomes a private Mixin Type. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
