Niclas Hedhman wrote: > +1 to all, with a slight reservation of "@URI". URI is so much, > whereas this is particular to schemas and RDF in general. One possible > alternative that I would like you to consider is @Schema instead. Not > totally important to me, but perhaps this hasn't crossed your mind.
That works, and I guess @Type would sort of work too. Anyway, the basic idea seems to be ok anyway, which is the important issue. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
