Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This way Aggregates should be able to repartition at any time without >> problems. >> >> Makes sense? > > A.k.a local cache... Sure, as long as the hit rate is "decent", and I > guess that depends on the application, so I think it would be cool to > look at some real world cases.
Another possibility is to use a proxy-setup, where all messages go through the "central switchboard" so there's no need for local "address books". Only the central proxy needs to know where everything is. This implies that all messages go through a two-step jump: sender-proxy, proxy-receiver. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
