On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > I am going through the API, and found the unused Asynchronous > annotation. The idea was to allow SideEffects to be marked as > Asynchronous so that they could be executed asynchronously. But this has > not been implemented, and I am now leaning more towards letting the > SideEffect always be synchronous, and instead it will have to trigger > asynchronous execution itself, internally, if it so wants to. > > So, my suggestion is to remove Asynchronous. Anyone against this?
No problems. I suggest to move it to the lib-executor for now, and we can build in that feature there. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
