Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Excellent questions! > > Another question related to this particular case; > Should we do the "RIGHT" thing or the "EQUIVALENT" thing?? > > If we go "RIGHT" we have a superior solution, more true to the > principles of DDD, but not smaller than the dddsample itself. > > If we go "EQUIVALENT", then we will not showcase the right thing... > > I vote for "RIGHT".
I absolutely agree. During the DDD Sweden meeting when they presented the sample app there were a number of questions about how they had did it, and they are apparently working on v2.0 already. So, it is definitely ok to take their current code as a starting point, but then "do it right". /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
