FYI, this appeared on the Guice list during a discussion about anemic vs. rich objects - you might find it somewhat familiar :)
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/be6959e2f4464f04/c8b252a40c50bd7e#c8b252a40c50bd7e ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brian Pontarelli One idea I've been tossing around lately is a new approach with a separation of data and function. Not sure what it would look like or how it would work, but it seems interesting to me. It would allow you to define a data class such as Human, but have that Human behave like a Infant at one point in time and a Teenager later. In the reverse, the Infant might need Human data, but also other data classes to function properly. Then later on the Teenager might also need the Human data, but other data to function. Need to think about it for another year or so to figure it all out. ;)
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

