On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suggestion;
> "The generic type of a Property must be a fully Serializable type, and
> must not have any injected members."
Actually, it is not the type that needs to be Serializable, but the
instance that is assigned to it.
This poses the question; Should we require the type to be Serializable
and change the Property definitions to
public interface Property<T extends Serializable>
extends PropertyInfo
or should we require the set() method to do the check and fail if the
instance is not Serializable,
or just let things fail 'late'?
I am in the position of the first, purely because I love compile time support.
Cheers
Niclas
--
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
