2009/1/12 Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Suggestion; > > "The generic type of a Property must be a fully Serializable type, and > > must not have any injected members." > > Actually, it is not the type that needs to be Serializable, but the > instance that is assigned to it. > This poses the question; Should we require the type to be Serializable > and change the Property definitions to > > public interface Property<T extends Serializable> > extends PropertyInfo > > or should we require the set() method to do the check and fail if the > instance is not Serializable, > > or just let things fail 'late'? > > I am in the position of the first, purely because I love compile time > support. >
yep, I'd lean towards <T extends Serializable> for the extra type-safety Cheers > Niclas > -- > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > _______________________________________________ > qi4j-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev > -- Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
