Am Dienstag 13 Januar 2009 09:15:54 schrieb Niclas Hedhman:
> > Now I think we need a framework on top of qi4j that simplifies the
> > configuration, delivers suitable defaults and does some convention over
> > configuration for the assemblies as well (tapestry 5 style..).
>
> From Qi4j's perspective, it can be done separately, and will never be
> a Core feature.

Yes, I meant something independent that sits on top of qi4j. Together with the 
maven archetype mentioned by Rickard, this could make things much easier.
Will think about this a bit more tonight.

        Piero



_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev

Reply via email to