On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Rickard Öberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> But when you say "bind to POJO", doesn't that mean mutable POJO's? > Working with mutable POJO's is trivial, but that's not the goal here. Trivial if you mean the code is simple, but it is extremely tedious. I think the nearest to a 'framework' that I know of is JGoodies... Cheers Niclas -- http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
