On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. The first thing I could do is just to ignore them and do not index, > do not allow query. So even if there is no support over there at least > there is no exception thrown, so one could still use the > collections/serializable props and persist them only that are not > indexed I suggest the above is the target for ver 0.6. > 2. I can index the collections very easy but we must decide then how > do we query based on this collection. We can have the same approach we > have with ManyAssociations: I suggest that support is done for 0.7 or 0.8. > WDYT? I am not a "query guy", and I know there are plenty of people on the list who has more opinion and experience on the topic. And as before, we should support the majority of queries needed, but not necessary everything, as we will have native/named query support later. Cheers Niclas -- http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
