Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I think that the Context Modifiers has the need, since if they declare > a Private Mixin, there must be something that implements it, and a bit > unlikely that it is present already in the underlying Composite.
Agree! So, the feature has to be there, to support .withConcerns(), if nothing else... > Whether there is a need for overriding public mixins or not, I have > currently no clue. Right. I would avoid it if possible, but the feature will be there at least given the above. I'll add it. It's trivial to implement. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
