When reading your post the get() set() in the accessor chain caught my eye once
again.
When doing stuff for squill (squill.dev.java.net) I used the shortes and
visually least impacting notation for method
names for creating tuples and accessing their values.
That is "_".
Could we add an optional shorthand notation that adds the following interface
onto Property
interface ShorthandProperty {
T _();
void _(T value);
}
which then just delegate to the get/set of Property?
That would change:
person.name().get().givenName().get()
to
person.name()._().givenName()._()
Which is (imho) more readable.
WDYAT ?
Michael
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
