When looking at the code I found simliar issues with names of types / classes / annotations and the like. Would it also be sensible to introduce a TypeName class for e.g. handling Class Names. (or at least an interface which could then either wrap a class or have a simple string based implementation).
That would also add an QualifiedName(TypeName, name) constructor or factory method to QN. There are just tooo many strings whirling aroundin qi4j (imho). The introduction of this construct could also be done incrementally. Michael _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
